The Importance of Focusing on Juvenile Offenders in the Justice System

Changes in Juvenile Justice Approach

By changing the way that juvenile justice is handled, the focus becomes giving attention to the offender rather than the offense. This shift in perspective has significant implications for how professionals in the field approach juvenile delinquency.

What Does This Mean?

A. Juvenile justice professionals should focus on helping rehabilitate offenders and at-risk youth.

B. Juvenile justice professionals must focus on passing stricter laws related to juvenile delinquency.

C. Juvenile justice professionals should implement stricter punishments for serious offenses.

D. Juvenile justice professions should focus on crimes as a way to understand juvenile delinquents.

What does it mean to focus on the offender in juvenile justice?

Final answer:

Juvenile justice focusing on the offender means prioritizing rehabilitation over punitive measures. It includes therapy, counseling, and educational programs to reduce future crimes. This approach is debated with some proposing juveniles be tried as adults for serious crimes. Therefore correct option is A

Explanation:

By changing the way that juvenile justice is handled to focus on giving attention to the offender rather than the offense, it means that juvenile justice professionals should focus on helping rehabilitate offenders and at-risk youth. This approach is rooted in the belief that rehabilitation can include elements of therapy, counseling, educational and vocational programs, and is more effective than punitive measures in reducing recidivism. With the increasing number of juveniles committing serious crimes and the failure of facilities to prevent recidivism, an alternative solution proposed is that juveniles should be tried as adults. This proposed solution has stirred debate over whether harsher punitive measures or rehabilitation and restorative justice practices serve as more effective deterrents and solutions for juvenile crime.

← Maritime affairs and vessel length regulations Freedom of speech in the first amendment →