The Legal Rights of a Person with Liver Cancer Caused by Artificial Sweetener

What legal options does a person with liver cancer, caused by artificial sweetener, have against the manufacturers?

a. there is no one to sue since "No Gordo" is not patented and is used in many products b. there is an assumption of the risk by consumers of such chemical products, so there is no liability c. he may sue in strict liability for unknown hazards against all makers of "No Gordo" d. there may be a suit in negligence against all makers of "No Gordo" for failure to adequately test the product e. there may be a suit for intentional liability under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act

Answer:

The person with liver cancer who has consumed products containing the artificial sweetener "No Gordo" for years may have legal options to sue the manufacturers. These options include strict liability, negligence, and intentional liability under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act.

In this case, the person with liver cancer who has consumed products containing the artificial sweetener "No Gordo" for years may have several legal options to sue the manufacturers. The possible legal options include:

  • Strict Liability: The person may sue in strict liability for unknown hazards against all makers of "No Gordo," holding them responsible for the harm caused by their product.
  • Negligence: There may be a suit in negligence against all makers of "No Gordo" for failure to adequately test the product before putting it on the market.
  • Intentional Liability under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act: The person could also pursue a suit for intentional liability under this act, which aims to protect consumers from deceptive warranty practices.

It is important to note that the person should consult with a legal professional to assess the specific circumstances of their case and determine the best course of action.

← Carpet knife vs common utility knife A hydrostatic skeleton vs body skeleton what makes them different →